Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_autocorrelation.wasp
Title produced by software(Partial) Autocorrelation Function
Date of computationTue, 02 Dec 2008 06:12:03 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Dec/02/t1228223686oirsoo0ft4zdbkt.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 02:42:14 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 02:42:14 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact181
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F     [Univariate Data Series] [Airline data] [2007-10-18 09:58:47] [42daae401fd3def69a25014f2252b4c2]
F RMPD    [(Partial) Autocorrelation Function] [q6] [2008-12-02 13:12:03] [d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-12-07 20:51:01 [Jasmine Hendrikx] [reply
Evaluatie Q6:
De student heeft de berekening goed uitgevoerd. Wel zou de number of time lags beter op 36 staan, aangezien we dan het langzaam dalende patroon beter kunnen zien. De student heeft dus eerst de ACF berekend zonder aanpassingen (D=0 en d=0). We zien dat we dus kunnen spreken van positieve autocorrelaties. Er is een langzaam dalend patroon. Er is dus een trendmatig verloop in onze tijdreeksen. We zien ook dat in de periode 12, 24, 36 er telkens een stijging is, dit wijst natuurlijk op seizoenaliteit. Er is sprake van een hangmatpatroon. Er is ook een langzaam dalend patroon in de seizoenale autocorrelatiecoëfficiënten aanwezig.
In de grafiek zijn alle autocorrelatiecoëfficiënten significant verschillend zijn van 0, aangezien ze allemaal buiten het betrouwbaarheidsinterval vallen.
De volgende berekening die de student heeft gemaakt is ineens deze van de VRM. Maar aangezien we uit de grafiek duidelijk van een lange termijn trend en seizoenaliteit kunnen spreken, moeten we de tijdreeks differentiëren. Dit heeft de student wel in Q5 gedaan, hoewel het dus bij deze vraag zou gedaan moeten worden. De bijkomende feedback zal ik dus hier bijschrijven.
Doordat we uit de grafiek een lange termijn trend kunnen afleiden, moet we dus eerst d gelijkstellen aan 1. Zoals de student correct vermeldt (in Q5) zien we dat de langetermijntrend nu volledig verdwenen is. We zien dus dat differentiëren helpt om de trend weg te werken. Wel zien we dat er toch nog een langzaam dalend patroon is in de seizoenale autocorrelatiefunctie (op lag 12, 24, 36). Wanneer we 60 periodes teruggaan, kunnen we enkel deze langzame daling bevestigen. Zoals er dan ook correct vermeld wordt, moeten we D dus gelijkstellen aan 1, we gaan dus 1 keer seizoenaal differentiëren om de seizoenaliteit eruit te halen. We zien nu dat het er veel beter uitziet. Het langzaam dalend patroon is volledig verdwenen en er is geen seizoenaliteit meer. De reeks is stationair wat betreft de trend. Ook vallen de meeste verticale lijntjes nu binnen het betrouwbaarheidsinterval.
2008-12-08 19:45:12 [Koen Van Baelen] [reply
Bespreking ACF: er is niet enkel een dalende trend op te merken maar ook seizoenaliteit, dit kan je zien aan de 'hangmatvormen' met steeds pieken op maand 12,24,...
De bespreking van de VRM en de spectraalanalyse zijn correct en volledig. Aan het resultaat moet men nog wel opmerken dat nog niet alle voorspelbaarheid is verdwenen, het ideale zou zijn dat de cumulatieve periodogram op een diagonaal komt te liggen

Post a new message
Dataseries X:
112
118
132
129
121
135
148
148
136
119
104
118
115
126
141
135
125
149
170
170
158
133
114
140
145
150
178
163
172
178
199
199
184
162
146
166
171
180
193
181
183
218
230
242
209
191
172
194
196
196
236
235
229
243
264
272
237
211
180
201
204
188
235
227
234
264
302
293
259
229
203
229
242
233
267
269
270
315
364
347
312
274
237
278
284
277
317
313
318
374
413
405
355
306
271
306
315
301
356
348
355
422
465
467
404
347
305
336
340
318
362
348
363
435
491
505
404
359
310
337
360
342
406
396
420
472
548
559
463
407
362
405
417
391
419
461
472
535
622
606
508
461
390
432




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132







Autocorrelation Function
Time lag kACF(k)T-STATP-value
10.94804711.37660
20.87557510.50690
30.8066819.68020
40.7526259.03150
50.713778.56520
60.6817348.18080
70.6629047.95490
80.655617.86730
90.6709488.05140
100.702728.43260
110.743248.91890
120.7603959.12470
130.7126618.55190
140.6463427.75610
150.5859237.03110
160.5379556.45550
170.4997485.9970
180.4687345.62480
190.4498715.39840
200.4416295.29950
210.4572245.48670

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Autocorrelation Function \tabularnewline
Time lag k & ACF(k) & T-STAT & P-value \tabularnewline
1 & 0.948047 & 11.3766 & 0 \tabularnewline
2 & 0.875575 & 10.5069 & 0 \tabularnewline
3 & 0.806681 & 9.6802 & 0 \tabularnewline
4 & 0.752625 & 9.0315 & 0 \tabularnewline
5 & 0.71377 & 8.5652 & 0 \tabularnewline
6 & 0.681734 & 8.1808 & 0 \tabularnewline
7 & 0.662904 & 7.9549 & 0 \tabularnewline
8 & 0.65561 & 7.8673 & 0 \tabularnewline
9 & 0.670948 & 8.0514 & 0 \tabularnewline
10 & 0.70272 & 8.4326 & 0 \tabularnewline
11 & 0.74324 & 8.9189 & 0 \tabularnewline
12 & 0.760395 & 9.1247 & 0 \tabularnewline
13 & 0.712661 & 8.5519 & 0 \tabularnewline
14 & 0.646342 & 7.7561 & 0 \tabularnewline
15 & 0.585923 & 7.0311 & 0 \tabularnewline
16 & 0.537955 & 6.4555 & 0 \tabularnewline
17 & 0.499748 & 5.997 & 0 \tabularnewline
18 & 0.468734 & 5.6248 & 0 \tabularnewline
19 & 0.449871 & 5.3984 & 0 \tabularnewline
20 & 0.441629 & 5.2995 & 0 \tabularnewline
21 & 0.457224 & 5.4867 & 0 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Autocorrelation Function[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Time lag k[/C][C]ACF(k)[/C][C]T-STAT[/C][C]P-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]1[/C][C]0.948047[/C][C]11.3766[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]2[/C][C]0.875575[/C][C]10.5069[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]3[/C][C]0.806681[/C][C]9.6802[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]4[/C][C]0.752625[/C][C]9.0315[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]5[/C][C]0.71377[/C][C]8.5652[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]6[/C][C]0.681734[/C][C]8.1808[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]7[/C][C]0.662904[/C][C]7.9549[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]8[/C][C]0.65561[/C][C]7.8673[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]9[/C][C]0.670948[/C][C]8.0514[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]10[/C][C]0.70272[/C][C]8.4326[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]11[/C][C]0.74324[/C][C]8.9189[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]12[/C][C]0.760395[/C][C]9.1247[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]13[/C][C]0.712661[/C][C]8.5519[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]14[/C][C]0.646342[/C][C]7.7561[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]15[/C][C]0.585923[/C][C]7.0311[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]16[/C][C]0.537955[/C][C]6.4555[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]17[/C][C]0.499748[/C][C]5.997[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]18[/C][C]0.468734[/C][C]5.6248[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]19[/C][C]0.449871[/C][C]5.3984[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]20[/C][C]0.441629[/C][C]5.2995[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]21[/C][C]0.457224[/C][C]5.4867[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Autocorrelation Function
Time lag kACF(k)T-STATP-value
10.94804711.37660
20.87557510.50690
30.8066819.68020
40.7526259.03150
50.713778.56520
60.6817348.18080
70.6629047.95490
80.655617.86730
90.6709488.05140
100.702728.43260
110.743248.91890
120.7603959.12470
130.7126618.55190
140.6463427.75610
150.5859237.03110
160.5379556.45550
170.4997485.9970
180.4687345.62480
190.4498715.39840
200.4416295.29950
210.4572245.48670







Partial Autocorrelation Function
Time lag kPACF(k)T-STATP-value
10.94804711.37660
2-0.229422-2.75310.003332
30.0381480.45780.323903
40.0937851.12540.131141
50.0736070.88330.189279
60.0077280.09270.463123
70.1255971.50720.066979
80.0899511.07940.141103
90.2324892.78990.002994
100.1660511.99260.024097
110.1712742.05530.020829
12-0.135431-1.62520.053156
13-0.539691-6.47630
14-0.02661-0.31930.374973
150.0907651.08920.138947
160.0249560.29950.382508
170.0325160.39020.348487
180.0734330.88120.189841
190.0484420.58130.280972
20-0.045542-0.54650.292784
210.0457530.5490.291916

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Partial Autocorrelation Function \tabularnewline
Time lag k & PACF(k) & T-STAT & P-value \tabularnewline
1 & 0.948047 & 11.3766 & 0 \tabularnewline
2 & -0.229422 & -2.7531 & 0.003332 \tabularnewline
3 & 0.038148 & 0.4578 & 0.323903 \tabularnewline
4 & 0.093785 & 1.1254 & 0.131141 \tabularnewline
5 & 0.073607 & 0.8833 & 0.189279 \tabularnewline
6 & 0.007728 & 0.0927 & 0.463123 \tabularnewline
7 & 0.125597 & 1.5072 & 0.066979 \tabularnewline
8 & 0.089951 & 1.0794 & 0.141103 \tabularnewline
9 & 0.232489 & 2.7899 & 0.002994 \tabularnewline
10 & 0.166051 & 1.9926 & 0.024097 \tabularnewline
11 & 0.171274 & 2.0553 & 0.020829 \tabularnewline
12 & -0.135431 & -1.6252 & 0.053156 \tabularnewline
13 & -0.539691 & -6.4763 & 0 \tabularnewline
14 & -0.02661 & -0.3193 & 0.374973 \tabularnewline
15 & 0.090765 & 1.0892 & 0.138947 \tabularnewline
16 & 0.024956 & 0.2995 & 0.382508 \tabularnewline
17 & 0.032516 & 0.3902 & 0.348487 \tabularnewline
18 & 0.073433 & 0.8812 & 0.189841 \tabularnewline
19 & 0.048442 & 0.5813 & 0.280972 \tabularnewline
20 & -0.045542 & -0.5465 & 0.292784 \tabularnewline
21 & 0.045753 & 0.549 & 0.291916 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=2

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Partial Autocorrelation Function[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Time lag k[/C][C]PACF(k)[/C][C]T-STAT[/C][C]P-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]1[/C][C]0.948047[/C][C]11.3766[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]2[/C][C]-0.229422[/C][C]-2.7531[/C][C]0.003332[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]3[/C][C]0.038148[/C][C]0.4578[/C][C]0.323903[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]4[/C][C]0.093785[/C][C]1.1254[/C][C]0.131141[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]5[/C][C]0.073607[/C][C]0.8833[/C][C]0.189279[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]6[/C][C]0.007728[/C][C]0.0927[/C][C]0.463123[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]7[/C][C]0.125597[/C][C]1.5072[/C][C]0.066979[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]8[/C][C]0.089951[/C][C]1.0794[/C][C]0.141103[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]9[/C][C]0.232489[/C][C]2.7899[/C][C]0.002994[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]10[/C][C]0.166051[/C][C]1.9926[/C][C]0.024097[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]11[/C][C]0.171274[/C][C]2.0553[/C][C]0.020829[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]12[/C][C]-0.135431[/C][C]-1.6252[/C][C]0.053156[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]13[/C][C]-0.539691[/C][C]-6.4763[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]14[/C][C]-0.02661[/C][C]-0.3193[/C][C]0.374973[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]15[/C][C]0.090765[/C][C]1.0892[/C][C]0.138947[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]16[/C][C]0.024956[/C][C]0.2995[/C][C]0.382508[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]17[/C][C]0.032516[/C][C]0.3902[/C][C]0.348487[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]18[/C][C]0.073433[/C][C]0.8812[/C][C]0.189841[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]19[/C][C]0.048442[/C][C]0.5813[/C][C]0.280972[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]20[/C][C]-0.045542[/C][C]-0.5465[/C][C]0.292784[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]21[/C][C]0.045753[/C][C]0.549[/C][C]0.291916[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=2

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=27724&T=2

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Partial Autocorrelation Function
Time lag kPACF(k)T-STATP-value
10.94804711.37660
2-0.229422-2.75310.003332
30.0381480.45780.323903
40.0937851.12540.131141
50.0736070.88330.189279
60.0077280.09270.463123
70.1255971.50720.066979
80.0899511.07940.141103
90.2324892.78990.002994
100.1660511.99260.024097
110.1712742.05530.020829
12-0.135431-1.62520.053156
13-0.539691-6.47630
14-0.02661-0.31930.374973
150.0907651.08920.138947
160.0249560.29950.382508
170.0325160.39020.348487
180.0734330.88120.189841
190.0484420.58130.280972
20-0.045542-0.54650.292784
210.0457530.5490.291916



Parameters (Session):
par1 = Default ; par2 = 1 ; par3 = 0 ; par4 = 0 ; par5 = 12 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = Default ; par2 = 1 ; par3 = 0 ; par4 = 0 ; par5 = 12 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
if (par1 == 'Default') {
par1 = 10*log10(length(x))
} else {
par1 <- as.numeric(par1)
}
par2 <- as.numeric(par2)
par3 <- as.numeric(par3)
par4 <- as.numeric(par4)
par5 <- as.numeric(par5)
if (par2 == 0) {
x <- log(x)
} else {
x <- (x ^ par2 - 1) / par2
}
if (par3 > 0) x <- diff(x,lag=1,difference=par3)
if (par4 > 0) x <- diff(x,lag=par5,difference=par4)
bitmap(file='pic1.png')
racf <- acf(x,par1,main='Autocorrelation',xlab='lags',ylab='ACF')
dev.off()
bitmap(file='pic2.png')
rpacf <- pacf(x,par1,main='Partial Autocorrelation',xlab='lags',ylab='PACF')
dev.off()
(myacf <- c(racf$acf))
(mypacf <- c(rpacf$acf))
lengthx <- length(x)
sqrtn <- sqrt(lengthx)
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Autocorrelation Function',4,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Time lag k',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('basics.htm','ACF(k)','click here for more information about the Autocorrelation Function'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'T-STAT',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'P-value',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
for (i in 2:(par1+1)) {
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,i-1,header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,round(myacf[i],6))
mytstat <- myacf[i]*sqrtn
a<-table.element(a,round(mytstat,4))
a<-table.element(a,round(1-pt(abs(mytstat),lengthx),6))
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Partial Autocorrelation Function',4,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Time lag k',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('basics.htm','PACF(k)','click here for more information about the Partial Autocorrelation Function'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'T-STAT',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'P-value',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
for (i in 1:par1) {
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,i,header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,round(mypacf[i],6))
mytstat <- mypacf[i]*sqrtn
a<-table.element(a,round(mytstat,4))
a<-table.element(a,round(1-pt(abs(mytstat),lengthx),6))
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable1.tab')