Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean2.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Mean with known Variance - p-value
Date of computationThu, 13 Nov 2008 02:14:55 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/13/t1226567800y392qicfo3368hw.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 26 May 2024 22:57:51 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24504, Retrieved Sun, 26 May 2024 22:57:51 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact182
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Testing Mean with known Variance - p-value] [the pork quality ...] [2008-11-13 09:14:55] [0cebda6bbc99948f606f5db2560512ab] [Current]
-   P     [Testing Mean with known Variance - p-value] [correctie Q2 pork...] [2008-11-24 20:40:40] [b1bd16d1f47bfe13feacf1c27a0abba5]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-24 09:25:22 [Anouk Greeve] [reply
De berekeningen zijn niet correct. Bij gevolg klopt de verklaring ook niet helemaal.
De type I error (alfa-fout) wordt meestal door het management bepaald. In dit geval hebben we deze zelf bepaald.
De p-value is de werkelijke kans dat men zich vergist. De kans dat men zich vergist, indien men een klacht indient, is 41% (p-value). De p-value is duidelijk veel groter dan de alfa-fout. De nulhypothese mag niet verworpen worden.
2008-11-24 21:29:00 [Jasmine Hendrikx] [reply
Evaluatie Q2:
De juiste methode is gebruikt (namelijk Testing Mean with known Variance – P-value), maar de berekening is verkeerd uitgevoerd. Bij population variance moet 0.012 ingevuld worden en niet 1.2. De sample mean moet 0.1546 zijn en niet 15.46 en bij de nulhypothese moet 0.15 ingevuld worden en niet 15. Hieronder staat de URL met de juiste berekeningen: http://www.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/24/t1227559299fdqiz1lsdykpdie.htm
Aangezien de berekening verkeerd is uitgevoerd, is ook de conclusie verkeerd. Allereerst moeten we vermelden dat we gebruik maken van de one-tailed omdat uit de vraagstelling blijkt dat er een sterk vermoeden is dat de leverancier oneerlijk is. De waarschijnlijkheid dat de klacht dan ongerechtvaardigd is, bedraagt dan 41.36%. Omdat de waarschijnlijkheid (p-waarde = 41.36%) groter is dan alfa (5%), is er geen reden om de nulhypothese te verwerpen. We gaan dus ook geen klacht indienen, het verschil tussen 15% en 15.46% is hoogstwaarschijnlijk te wijten aan toeval.

Post a new message




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 2 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24504&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]2 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24504&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24504&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24







Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance1.2
sample mean15.46
null hypothesis about mean15
type I error0.05
Z-value2.18197158551619
p-value (one-tailed)0.0145558149366922
p-value (two-tailed)0.0291116298733844
conclusion for one-tailed test
Reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion for two-tailed test
Reject the null hypothesis

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
sample size & 27 \tabularnewline
population variance & 1.2 \tabularnewline
sample mean & 15.46 \tabularnewline
null hypothesis about mean & 15 \tabularnewline
type I error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
Z-value & 2.18197158551619 \tabularnewline
p-value (one-tailed) & 0.0145558149366922 \tabularnewline
p-value (two-tailed) & 0.0291116298733844 \tabularnewline
conclusion for one-tailed test \tabularnewline
Reject the null hypothesis. \tabularnewline
conclusion for two-tailed test \tabularnewline
Reject the null hypothesis \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24504&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample size[/C][C]27[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]population variance[/C][C]1.2[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample mean[/C][C]15.46[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]null hypothesis about mean[/C][C]15[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type I error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Z-value[/C][C]2.18197158551619[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]p-value (one-tailed)[/C][C]0.0145558149366922[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]p-value (two-tailed)[/C][C]0.0291116298733844[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]conclusion for one-tailed test[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Reject the null hypothesis.[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]conclusion for two-tailed test[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Reject the null hypothesis[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24504&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24504&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance1.2
sample mean15.46
null hypothesis about mean15
type I error0.05
Z-value2.18197158551619
p-value (one-tailed)0.0145558149366922
p-value (two-tailed)0.0291116298733844
conclusion for one-tailed test
Reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion for two-tailed test
Reject the null hypothesis



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 1.2 ; par3 = 15.46 ; par4 = 15 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 1.2 ; par3 = 15.46 ; par4 = 15 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
par5<-as.numeric(par5)
c <- 'NA'
csn <- abs(qnorm(par5))
csn2 <- abs(qnorm(par5/2))
z <- (par3 - par4) / (sqrt(par2/par1))
p <- 1-pnorm(z)
if (par3 == par4)
{
conclusion <- 'Error: the null hypothesis and sample mean must not be equal.'
conclusion2 <- conclusion
} else {
if (p < par5/2)
{
conclusion2 <- 'Reject the null hypothesis'
} else {
conclusion2 <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis'
}
}
if (p < par5)
{
conclusion <- 'Reject the null hypothesis.'
} else {
conclusion <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis.'
}
p
conclusion
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample size',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'null hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type I error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par5)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Z-value',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,z)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value (one-tailed)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,p)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value (two-tailed)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,p*2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'conclusion for one-tailed test',2,header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,conclusion,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'conclusion for two-tailed test',2,header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,conclusion2,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')