FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_pairs.wasp
Title produced by softwareKendall tau Correlation Matrix
Date of computationThu, 30 Oct 2008 08:22:45 -0600
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Oct/30/t1225376675u3ugfksrdgq8e9q.htm/, Retrieved Fri, 17 May 2024 06:37:17 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20059, Retrieved Fri, 17 May 2024 06:37:17 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact172

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F     [Notched Boxplots] [workshop 3] [2007-10-26 13:31:48] [e9ffc5de6f8a7be62f22b142b5b6b1a8]
F RMPD    [Kendall tau Correlation Matrix] [Q1, part2] [2008-10-30 14:22:45] [3cb29b4293f2e3432d2608f7187d3d03] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-06 11:51:34 [Ken Van den Heuvel] [reply] 
Je concludeerd niets in je antwoord en beantwoorde de vraag uit het geleverde document niet.

Uit deze computation stel je vast dat RCF de beste predictor voor RNR met een correlatie van 80,95% en een kleine p-waarde van 0,01.

De p-waarde is de betrouwbaarheid van de correlatie. Alles kleiner dan 0,05 is betrouwbaar.
2008-11-06 11:54:36 [Ken Van den Heuvel] [reply] 
Deze berekening is trouwens unverified...*Unverified author*, zoals bovenaan de pagina staat vermeld.

Ookal is je naam vermeld, toch kan ik onmogelijk met zekerheid stellen dat deze computation weldegelijk van jouw is.
2008-11-07 17:53:35 [Jan Van Riet] [reply] 
Je berekening klopt wel maar je doet er verder niets mee. Uit de grafiek en de tabel is duidelijk af te leiden dat het grootste verband ligt tussen RNR en RCF. De tau-correlatiewaarde ligt het hoogst tussen deze 2 tijdreeksen, en op de linkerkant van het kendal-tau correlation plot (betrouwbaarheid van de correlatiecoeficient) zien we dit ook. Hoe hoger deze laatste is, des te meer toevallig je zoiets gevonden hebt. Tussen deze 2 tijdreeksen is deze waarde het kleinst, nl. 0,01.
2008-11-11 16:36:02 [Bart Haemels] [reply] 
Je werkwijze is volledig correct en je uitkomst ook. Enkel geef je geen conclusie.

Zoals je kan zien is er een zeer grote correlatie tussen RNR en RCF dit kan je zien op de grafiek boven RCF en rechts van RNR.

De p-value, wat een soort van betrouwbaarheids predictor is, toont aan met een een p-value van 0.01 dat deze correlatie zeer betrouwbaar is.

Post a new message

Dataset

Dataseries X:
Download CSV
Histogram
Boxplots 
4,2	4,8	20,8	0,9	39,6
2,6	-4,2	17,1	0,85	36,1
3	1,6	22,3	0,83	34,4
3,8	5,2	25,1	0,84	33,4
4	9,2	27,7	0,85	34,8
3,5	4,6	24,9	0,83	33,7
4,1	10,6	29,5	0,83	36,3

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20059&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20059&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20059&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135






Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pairtaup-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )0.7142857142857140.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )0.5238095238095240.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )0.3333333333333330.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )0.809523809523810.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )-0.05292561240249630.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )0.04761904761904761
tau( RCF , RLEZ )-0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )-0.1428571428571430.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )0.3704792868174740.266379923342483

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series \tabularnewline
pair & tau & p-value \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RNR ) & 0.714285714285714 & 0.0301587301587301 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RCF ) & 0.523809523809524 & 0.136111111111111 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RLEZ ) & 0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , REV ) & 0.333333333333333 & 0.381349206349206 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RCF ) & 0.80952380952381 & 0.0107142857142857 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RLEZ ) & -0.0529256124024963 & 0.873844698517373 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , REV ) & 0.0476190476190476 & 1 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , RLEZ ) & -0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , REV ) & -0.142857142857143 & 0.772619047619048 \tabularnewline
tau( RLEZ , REV ) & 0.370479286817474 & 0.266379923342483 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20059&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]pair[/C][C]tau[/C][C]p-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RNR )[/C][C]0.714285714285714[/C][C]0.0301587301587301[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RCF )[/C][C]0.523809523809524[/C][C]0.136111111111111[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RLEZ )[/C][C]0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , REV )[/C][C]0.333333333333333[/C][C]0.381349206349206[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RCF )[/C][C]0.80952380952381[/C][C]0.0107142857142857[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.0529256124024963[/C][C]0.873844698517373[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , REV )[/C][C]0.0476190476190476[/C][C]1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , REV )[/C][C]-0.142857142857143[/C][C]0.772619047619048[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RLEZ , REV )[/C][C]0.370479286817474[/C][C]0.266379923342483[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20059&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20059&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pairtaup-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )0.7142857142857140.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )0.5238095238095240.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )0.3333333333333330.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )0.809523809523810.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )-0.05292561240249630.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )0.04761904761904761
tau( RCF , RLEZ )-0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )-0.1428571428571430.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )0.3704792868174740.266379923342483


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
Parameters (R input):
R code (references can be found in the software module):
panel.tau <- function(x, y, digits=2, prefix='', cex.cor)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(0, 1, 0, 1))
rr <- cor.test(x, y, method='kendall')
r <- round(rr$p.value,2)
txt <- format(c(r, 0.123456789), digits=digits)[1]
txt <- paste(prefix, txt, sep='')
if(missing(cex.cor)) cex <- 0.5/strwidth(txt)
text(0.5, 0.5, txt, cex = cex)
}
panel.hist <- function(x, ...)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(usr[1:2], 0, 1.5) )
h <- hist(x, plot = FALSE)
breaks <- h$breaks; nB <- length(breaks)
y <- h$counts; y <- y/max(y)
rect(breaks[-nB], 0, breaks[-1], y, col='grey', ...)
}
bitmap(file='test1.png')
pairs(t(y),diag.panel=panel.hist, upper.panel=panel.smooth, lower.panel=panel.tau, main=main)
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series',3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'pair',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'tau',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value',1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
n <- length(y[,1])
n
cor.test(y[1,],y[2,],method='kendall')
for (i in 1:(n-1))
{
for (j in (i+1):n)
{
a<-table.row.start(a)
dum <- paste('tau(',dimnames(t(x))[[2]][i])
dum <- paste(dum,',')
dum <- paste(dum,dimnames(t(x))[[2]][j])
dum <- paste(dum,')')
a<-table.element(a,dum,header=TRUE)
r <- cor.test(y[i,],y[j,],method='kendall')
a<-table.element(a,r$estimate)
a<-table.element(a,r$p.value)
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')